Date:         Sun, 10 Nov 2002 07:19:53 +1100
From: "sub.sista" <netwurker@HOTKEY.NET.AU>
Subject: "digital pole[mics]" .verse.s. [   -   ]

At 05:52 PM 8/11/2002 -0800, you wrote:

>Would be ineterested quite alarmingly in responses to this question:
>
>Are "digital poetry" and net art two distinct genres? And, perhaps more
>importantly, should they be?



.setting. the.cat. a.m.ongst.the.pro.verb[d]ial[up].klee|stool.pidgins.
.re.routed.D-villes.ad[d]vokat.
.gen[de]r.e.vacuu[groo]med[bracket].packets.


..........||...............................||..............................................||
[+sense.auteurity.sniffling+]

}
.di.[f]lute.
+
.dye[d with a parsing spoon].late.
+
di.s[in]sect[of the bo.vine.theory.x.tract]ion
}



. . .... .....
pro][tean][.lapsing.txt
.
.
www.cddc.vt.edu/host/netwurker/
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/display.myopia.swf

.... . .??? .......



Back to artcom unstable digest vol 21